‘Family values’ African charter condemned by rights groups as regressive and dangerous
Photo: Unsplash

‘Family values’ African charter condemned by rights groups as regressive and dangerous

Originally reported by The Guardian International

"Rights groups condemn treaty as regressive and dangerous, sparking controversy across continent."

African governments met in Ghana this week to discuss a draft treaty. The charter claims sexual and reproductive health and rights are an existential threat to the African family, prompting widespread criticism from human rights groups.

The draft African charter on family, sovereignty and values asserts that African values and culture are under attack from foreign ideologies, urging states to withdraw from any agreements that do not align with the principles of the charter. This includes the 2003 Maputo protocol, which promotes gender equality and protects the reproductive and health rights of women and girls.

Critics argue that the charter's rejection of longstanding international human rights obligations is a regressive and dangerous step backwards for the continent. By withdrawing from agreements such as the Maputo protocol, African governments would be abandoning their commitments to promoting gender equality and protecting the health and wellbeing of women and girls.

The implications of this charter are far-reaching and potentially devastating. Women and girls would be disproportionately affected, with their access to reproductive healthcare and education severely limited. This would not only undermine their human rights but also perpetuate cycles of poverty and inequality.

Moreover, the charter's emphasis on traditional values and culture is seen as a thinly veiled attempt to impose a rigid and patriarchal worldview on African societies. This would have a chilling effect on diversity and inclusivity, suppressing the voices and experiences of marginalized communities.

Human rights groups have condemned the charter, citing its regressive and discriminatory provisions. They argue that the charter's rejection of international human rights obligations is a clear attempt to undermine the progress made in promoting gender equality and protecting the rights of women and girls.

As the charter moves closer to becoming policy, there are growing concerns about the impact it will have on African societies. The continent is already struggling to address issues such as poverty, inequality, and social injustice. The adoption of this charter would only exacerbate these problems, perpetuating a culture of discrimination and oppression.

In conclusion, the draft African charter on family, sovereignty and values is a deeply troubling development that has far-reaching implications for human rights and social justice on the continent. As African governments consider adopting this charter, they must be aware of the devastating consequences it would have for women, girls, and marginalized communities.